Introduction and a Confident Posture
In today’s international scene, a leader’s choice to use force drives not only military success but also the architecture of long-term stability and security. The operations implemented during President Donald Trump’s second term include not only short-term goals but also a series of strategies that shake the global balance of power. This approach, which centers on the principle of peace through force, manifests itself especially in critical regions such as Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Syria and the Caribbean. This article provides an in-depth look at the aims, tactics and regional effects of these operations, while offering a special perspective from the perspective of international security and military strategy.
First Major Operation in Somalia: A New Era in the Fight against ISIS
Somalia-focused operations clearly demonstrated the US’s determination to eliminate terrorist threats in East Africa in the new era. As stated by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the goals were to secure citizens and partners and reduce the threat from ISIS-affiliated elements. These steps, supported by air and ground operations, are considered a critical cornerstone for long-term stability in the region. Somalia operations provide a comprehensive framework that also considers humanitarian outcomes: elements such as intelligence sharing, coordination with local forces, and protecting civilian infrastructure strengthen integration with international coalitions.
Iraq Operations: Threat Perception Spreading from Anbar to the World
The airstrike in Iraq’s Anbar province resulted in the neutralization of the second senior leader of ISIS and the militants. In the words of the Iraqi Prime Minister, this person was described as “one of the most dangerous terrorists who pose a great threat to Iraq and the world.” This operation was noted as a turning point for the US-Iraq partnership. While hitting the targeted points, reconnaissance, intelligence sharing and simultaneous operations played a critical role. As a result, a reassuring signal of security and stability spread across the region; but long-term impacts will be measured by reconstruction and legitimate security capacity building.
Mobility in Yemen: Concise Air Operations
Air operations in Yemen include a coordinated fight against the Iran-backed Houthis. The operations, which began in mid-March, aimed to target the command structure and advanced weapons production/storage facilities. The ammunition and missiles used in this process also attracted attention in terms of cost; In the first month, the cost of operations exceeded $1 billion. In this context, the role of air and missile technology determines the long-term defense capacity of the region as well as the short-term advantages in the field. While Yemen operations redefine offensive strategies and defense balances, they also require thinking about humanitarian consequences and the need for dialogue with local actors.
Operation Against Iran: Midnight Hammer
Operation “Midnight Hammer” was recorded as an intervention directed at Iran’s deep nuclear facilities. B-2 bombers departing from Missouri dropped heavily loaded GBU-57 ammunition on Fordo and Natanz; The US navy in the region responded with Tomahawk missiles against Iran. President Trump’s statements included the claim that Fordo was completely destroyed; Iran disputed these claims and stated that the impact of the operations could last for years. The common denominator of this conflict can be seen as balancing nuclear reduction pressure with impacts on regional balance. However, the results will require time to build trust between the parties, and distance negotiation and confidence-building measures will be critical in this process.
Caribbean and Pacific Ocean: Naval Forces Fighting Drugs
The operations carried out in the Caribbean and Pacific Ocean since September were shaped by the aim of weakening narcotics cartels and blocking illegal flows flowing to Venezuela. The powerful naval demonstrations were carried out in an integrated strategy with international cooperation. These operations also covered issues such as maritime security, civilian passenger and commercial ship security. As a result, clearance and monitoring capacity in the region has been strengthened; but concerns about human rights and civilian casualties also attracted attention. In the long term, deeper reforms will be required in areas such as flow management and stemming the flow of black money.
Operation Syria: Hawkeye Sweep and the Psychology of Retaliation
The Hawkeye Sweep operation in Syria was aimed at retaliation after the loss of two US soldiers and a civilian. Air and ground troops hit more than 70 targets affiliated with ISIS. This operation, directed in memory of the Wisconsin martyrs, reinforced the message of determination in the fight against terrorism. However, the scope and impact of the operation was considered a critical turning point in terms of pressures on civilian infrastructure, trust relations with the local population, and long-term peace efforts. In this context, coordination with civil protection and humanitarian aid elements was indispensable for the sustainability of the strategy.
Operation Nigeria: Strategic Objectives on Christmas Day
Airstrikes in Nigeria on Christmas Day focused on radical Islamist militants, particularly targeting the Christian community. Operations carried out with Tomahawk missiles launched from the American ship in the Gulf of Guinea were continued in coordination with the Nigerian army. President Trump stated that this move is a historic step and that, unlike previous initiatives, they aim to achieve stronger results. These steps aim to increase the capacity of local security forces and support regional stability. However, Nigerian operations also require a multi-layered assessment of local dynamics and humanitarian impacts.
Covert Operations Against Venezuela: Pressure with Drones and Naval Forces
A covert drone strike against Venezuela was part of increasing pressure on Nicolás Maduro’s administration. According to CNN, this operation targeted the narcotics storage and shipping chains of the Tren De Aragua gangs. A selected pier off the coast of Venezuela stood out as the main point of the operation, and military activity in the region increased. Secret operations and naval power indicators tended to change the security balance in the region. In this process, intelligence sharing, operational speed and civilian loss were among the most critical risks and received wide publicity.
Evaluating Results: Strategic Impact and Regional Balance
This series of operations can be seen as a global show of force; but the real question is, how does it contribute to the long-term security architecture? The main lines of the impact can be summarized as follows: coalitions and cooperation have strengthened, defense technologies and pressure tools offered as gifts have strengthened, vulnerability to terrorist organizations has been triggered, and compliance with international law and humanitarian sensitivities have been taken into greater consideration. However, issues such as the fragility of trust between regional actors, economic pressures and civilian casualties directly affect the legitimacy and sustainability of operations. Therefore, future steps must proceed through local legitimacy building, intergovernmental dialogue and comprehensive civilian participation.
Be the first to comment