Case Opened in December 2025
eu‑LISA initiated legal action in December 2025 in the Harju County Court of Estonia against a consortium formed by IBM Belgium, Atos Belgium and Leonardo after repeated missed milestones and delivery delays in the Entry/Exit System (EES) project. The agency framed the suit as a measure to protect public finances and contractual expectations; The court has confirmed receipt of the file but has not yet set a hearing schedule. The claim focuses on missed delivery dates and the financial consequences recorded in the contract’s penalty regime, while liability will be determined through the judicial process.
The Contract Price of the Project Increased from 142 Million Euros to 212 Million
eu‑LISA awarded a six‑year contract in 2019 covering development and maintenance of the central EES to the IBM/Atos/Leonardo consortium. The original procurement figure was €142 million; contract modifications in 2021 increased the value to €212 million — an uplift of €70 million, or roughly 49% over the initial award. That revised figure represents the contract budget, not the quantum eu-LISA seeks as damages in the lawsuit.
Companies Objected to the Imposed Fines
Consortium members disputed penalties imposed by eu-LISA. IBM Belgium and Atos Belgium formally challenged factors penalty calculations in October 2021, arguing that certain delay—such as COVID‑19 disruptions—fell outside their control. In February 2022 the three companies contested a revised delivery timetable set by eu‑LISA, calling the schedule unrealistic and pointing to project management and integration issues. Those disputes escalated over subsequent years and ultimately contributed to the legal action.
The EES was originally scheduled for operational roll-out in 2022 but encountered multiple software, hardware and implementation setbacks. The system began phased activation on 12 October 2025 and reached full operational status at external Schengen border crossing points on 10 April 2026. Early live operations exposed intermittent failures in biometric scanners at several airports, producing longer passenger processing times and queues. The consortium’s initial development contract concluded in 2025 and subsequent maintenance was transferred to a different provider.
Turkish Citizens Are Also Subject to the System
EES records short‑stay entry and exit movements of third‑country nationals visiting the Schengen area; Turkish citizens without a long‑stay visa or residence permit falls within scope. The system captures passport data, facial images and fingerprint templates electronically to detect overstays and identity fraud more effectively. Certain travelers with valid residence permits or long‑term visas are exempt. The EES now applies across 29 Schengen states.
Legal Process Does Not Affect Existing Border Controls
eu‑LISA says ongoing litigation does not affect the operational status of EES. The concerns are development and delivery delays rather than defects discovered during live operation, so border authorities continue biometric passport checks and EES lookups. The legal outcome could, however, set precedents for liability allocation and financial remedies in large public IT procurements across the EU.
How the Dispute Affects Travelers, Airports and Future Contracts
Travelers experienced isolated delays tied to biometric hardware performance; Airports mitigated the impact by adding manual processing lanes and deploying backup devices. For procurement teams, the case highlights three practical lessons: (1) include clear, pandemic‑proof change‑control and force‑majeure terms; (2) design penalty clauses that differentiate between developer‑caused delays and external risks; and (3) require stronger independent verification gates during integration phases to catch interoperability issues early.
Key Dates, Numbers and Practical Examples
Relevant chronological and numeric facts provide concrete context:
Contract award: 2019 to IBM/Atos/Leonardo consortium.
Initial value: €142 million (2019).
Revised value: €212 million (2021 amendment).
Legal action: Filed December 2025 in Estonia’s Harju County Court.
Phased activation: 12 October 2025; full operation across external borders on 10 April 2026.
Example: an airport that faced biometric scanner downtime temporarily routed travelers through manual identity checks for an average of 8–12 minutes extra processing time, which required staffing surges to avoid cascading delays for subsequent flights.
Questions Likely Asked by the Public (People Also Ask)
Q: Will the disaster stop EES from working? No — the litigation addresses delivery delays during development and does not automatically suspend live EES operations.
Q: Does €212 million equal the damages claimed? No — €212 million is the contract’s revised value; Any damages awarded will be determined by the court based on contractual breach and actual loss calculations.
Q: Are travellers’ biometric data at risk because of this dispute? There is no public indication the legal dispute affected data security; operational authorities continue to follow EU data‑protection rules for biometric processing.
What to Watch Next
Follow these points for developments likely to matter to officials, travelers and procurement professionals:
1) Court schedule and judgment in Estonia on allocation of liability and any ordered compensation.
2) Technical post-mortem reports or audit findings identifying root causes of delays and scanner failures.
3) Contracting changes in future EU digital border projects informed by lessons from this case (stronger verification gates, clearer risk sharing, refined penalty clauses).
Bottom Line for Stakeholders
Be the first to comment