Menemen'da TCDD General Directorate of the quarry planned to be made by the Izmir Governorship 'EIA is not necessary' decision Izmir 3. The Administrative Court had canceled. The TCDD appealed the matter, but the Council of State approved the decision of the local court and decided that the quarry could not be opened on the grounds that it would harm the environment, agricultural areas and olive trees.
Menemen Değirmendere Village is adjacent to the Süleymanlı regulator and on the hill near the Gediz River approximately 750 meters. 'Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is not required'. Menemen Municipality, Tradesmen and Craftsmen Credit and Bail Cooperative, Menemen Drivers and Automobile Chamber, Menemen Chamber of Agriculture, Menemen Chamber of Minibusers, Menemen Chamber of Craftsmen, Menemen Chamber of Commerce and Menemen Chamber of Commerce, Menemen Environment and Solidarity Platform Izmir 1 with the request. A case was filed in the Administrative Court. 600. Administrative Court, the Governor's decision 'EIA is not necessary' in February 2017'da canceled. TCDD appealed for the annulment of the annulment decision.
After listening to the opinion of the Supervisory Judge of the Council of State, the sixth Chamber of the Council of State decided, “After hearing the explanations of the Auditing Judge and examining the documents in the file, the necessity of the work was discussed. The decision of the Administrative and Tax Courts can be violated by reviewing the appeal by the Administrative Procedure Law No. 2577. If one of the reasons mentioned in the article. Izmir 49. Decision 3 / 20 / 02 dated and E2019 / 2017, K1897 / 2019 issued by the Administrative Court and the grounds on which it is based are in accordance with the law and procedure and there is no reason to cause the reversal of the appeal. , the file is sent to the Court, 253 Administrative Procedure Procedure Law No. 2577 / A - 20- (i) article in accordance with the announcement of the decision is closed, 2 / 26 / 06 on the basis of unanimity was decided by unanimity.
Very close to Gediz River
Some of the provisions of the Council of State's justification and approval of the local court are as follows: , 500 access license number is located on a sloping hill, gardens, structures, agricultural areas and scrubs are located on the land, the immovable property is located very close to the Gediz River and has a very intense texture in terms of archeology and art history. In the region, which is extremely rich in archaeological ruins belonging to the Ancient Greek and Roman Periods, the area contains intense medieval immovable and movable archaeological cultural assets. (First) and 750. (Third) Degree Archaeological Site area of the project is considered to be the case, 'll-A group mine quarry, crushing-sieving mechanical plant and ready-mixed concrete facility was understood to be effective.
Dust calculations not done correctly
In terms of environmental engineering, dust is the most important pollutant to be created by the enterprise in question, and fine particles can be transported over long distances after the control, and may have negative effects on human and plant life. It is observed that there is an agricultural production area in which the region is particularly concentrated in olive, fruit, cereal and vegetable cultivation. in the vicinity of the olive groves in the area, as well as in the license area in the makilik areas crazy or In case of the presence of 250-300 m, olive and 500-600 m in neighboring parcels where there are vaccinated individual olive trees, the damages that are not foreseen in the PTD in terms of dust emission will be considered. It was found that the decision Not necessary was not appropriate. Based on the current project identification file 'EIA is not required' decision can not be concluded, the Administrative Court's decision should be decided to cancel the decision of the subject matter for the reason stated that we do not participate in the majority decision.
Urla 'EIA cancellation decision' was approved
It was decided that 'Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is not required by İzmir Governorship for the quarry to be established in Urla. The residents of the neighborhood won the lawsuit filed at the Izmir 2 Administrative Court for the cancellation of the EIA. Upon reviewing the file, the 6 Chamber of the Council of State upheld the decision of the local court.
It is decided that 'EIA is not necessary' for the limestone quarry and crushing and screening plant that is wanted to be established between Kadıovacık and Balıklıova districts of Urla. After the decision of the Izmir Governor's Office, the residents and environmentalists who filed a cancellation lawsuit at the Izmir 2 Administrative Court ensured the cancellation of the project after a long struggle. The court determined that the project site, which it examined on sketches, is less than 3 kilometers from the olive groves. The court did not see the need for discovery, 'EIA is not necessary' has canceled the decision. The court's decision was celebrated by the residents of Balıklıova 25 in April, who made a bagel and those living in Kadıovacık were cooking and distributing keskek. However, the governorship of Izmir objected to the decision of the local court. The 2 Chamber of the Council of State, which examined the file after the objection requested by the İzmir 6 Administrative Court to overturn the decision on the grounds that it was contrary to the procedure and the law, stated that there were none of the reasons for breach in the appeal decision and upheld the decision emphasized that it was in accordance with the procedure and the law. (Halil Özcan - Haberekspres)