Osmangazi Bridge on the 3.3 Million claim to stress!

Osmangazi koprusunde 3 3 billion claim the accent
Osmangazi koprusunde 3 3 billion claim the accent

The Court of Accounts found that the company's firm would gain unjustified gain on 2017 billion 3 million 323 thousand pounds by 978 numbers due to the uncontrolled extension of the application contract at Osmangazi Bridge.

He stressed that the company would gain unjustified earnings by constructing the bridge from the contract, starting the contract early, ending the construction and remaining the extra time. It was also stated in the TCA report that the first 400 million liras of the expropriation value was not taken from the contractor company. CHP Party Assembly member Haydar Akar, "Build-operate-transfer model as look-work-wealth model," he said.

Irregularities in the General Directorate of Highways on the Osman Gazi Bridge known as Gebze-Orhangazi-Izmir Highway and Izmit Gulf Crossing Bridge were determined by the Auditors of the Court of Accounts. Most of the irregularities reflected in the 2017 reports arose due to the uncontrolled extension of the implementation contract of the project, which was tendered by the build-operate-transfer model. Due to the uncontrolled extension of the application contract, the operating company has determined that 2017 will earn 3 billion 323 billion 978 unjustified earnings.


The conditions in the application contract for the motorway construction work had to come into effect on the 180 day. This period was exceeded and the sanctions foreseen by the contract were determined.

The deadline for the enforcement of the implementation contract was 26 March 2011. However, contrary to the tender, the application contract was put into effect on 715 days 15 March 2013. The 715 of the day was caused by the negativity caused by the General Directorate of Highways. The recognition of this period as an additional operating period for the operating company was normally met. However, the auditors of the TCA found that the remaining delay of the 276 was not related to the directorate and there was a delay in the responsibility of the operating company. The 439 daily delay had to be deducted from the operating period, but the office did not fall for the period of operation. The Court of Auditors calculated the 439 daily operating time of the 439 with 2017 numbers per day from the 7 million 571 thousand 705 liras.


Determining that the construction of the highway and bridge construction company, the contract early in the construction of the auditors, said that this situation is a huge unfair advantage. According to the contract, the operation time of the bridges and highways 22 year 4 month. The 7 year of this period was defined as the ı production process Bu. 7 22 will be added to the 4 month after operation period. Construction work began before the contract before the firm began construction of the place. Thus, the company company, the construction of the bridge with a moment to finish the extra time to obtain an unjustified gain in the report was emphasized in the report.

The auditors of the TCA said that the actual construction of the company could not be determined when the construction work started and therefore the unjust gain could not be calculated clearly. In other words, it was not possible to calculate the operating company's operating rights for an extra period of time.


The scandals related to Osmangazi Bridge and Izmir Motorway were not limited to this. According to the contract, the first 400 million pounds of the expropriation process was to cover the company that undertakes the work. After the completion of the expropriation of 400 million pounds, the administration would take over and expropriations would be made in the name of the Treasury. However, the General Directorate of Highways and the Treasury here also made a great contribution to the operating company and did not ask the operating company to demand money for expropriation.


The operator paid 400 million pounds for the first part of the expropriation and then paid the administration to the administration. But the interest on this amount was not paid. The auditors did not reflect the amount of interest that should be paid since the expropriation process started, and the amount of interest to be paid.

The auditors stated that the operating company did not pay any court costs for the expropriation transactions. In 2015, the General Directorate of Highways stated that they only paid 1 million 40 thousand pounds for the courts. The TCA auditors, who determined that the project has been expropriated for a total of 1 billion 651 million pounds, stated that all the expenses other than expropriation fees should be paid by the operating company and these prices were not taken by the administration.


CHP Party Assembly member Haydar Akar made a statement on the subject. Akar used the following statements in his description; Ular They demonstrated the build-operate-transfer model as a look-work-fortune model. This model revives all the companies they tend to tender. The TCA auditors were able to document only a fraction of the 3.3 billion. This figure is increasing with the interest payments that are not made with court costs. 3 this outfit made only on the Osmangazi Bridge. Add other giant projects built with this model, such as the airport. Almost all of them have irregularities in the contract. Almost all of them operate like mints for operating companies. Along with the warranty tolls, with the guarantee passenger fees, the build-operate-transfer model that can develop the country if it is actually implemented properly together with the agreements made with foreign currency, unfortunately, our country stands as a black hole. In our pocket, our safe, our treasure, the citizen's bread, the labor of the pensioner is swallowing. He stole from the citizen and returns to the citizen as a more expensive service than necessary. Tan

Source : www.sozcu.com.tr


Be the first to comment