Kadir Topbaş was acquitted in the metro case: Kadir Topbaş was acquitted in the case of Bağcılar-Başak Konutları metro tender which was decided by 6 year after year.
Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Mayor Kadir Topbas'ın including the 15 pending the defendants of the Bağcılar-Başak Houses in the auction of the allegations of 'abuse of office' were tried for the claim that the case after the year 6 was connected. The court stated that no clear and clear concrete evidence was available to ensure that all kinds of suspicions were sufficient to punish the defendants who were imprisoned from the 1 to the 3 year. Taking into account the principle of ine Doubtful suspect ayrı, the court ruled that Kadir Topbaş and the other defendants were acquitted separately.
21 located in Istanbul Palace of Justice. The court of first instance in Istanbul, Kadir Topbaş, the mayor of Istanbul, was among the defendants. Kadir Topbaş was attorney Fahri Biçer in the hearing and the other defendants were represented by Attorney Abdullah Buladı. The complainant Cemal Acar was present at the hearing. On the other hand, CHP deputy Atilla Kart attended the hearing as an audience.
EXPERTS REPORT REACHED THE COURT
Judge, Mehmet Hamzaçebi, said the expert report reached court. 19 January 2015 date is stated in the conclusion of the report that the work to be done to the same contractor is an economic necessity for the public. In the examination, it was noted that there was no public loss and unjustified gain to persons.
CUSTOMER: THE DUTY WAS POSSIBLE BY CRIMINAL USES, THE CRIMES ARE PENALIZED
Complainant Cemal Acar said, ile It is also fixed that an unfair tender has been provided to an existing contractor by eliminating the competition and competition conditions without a tender and by making the contract to the same contractor. I demand that the defendants be punished separately because the misconduct has occurred in terms of criminal offenses Görev.
”I CAN NOT THINK THE PERSONALITY OF THE INVESTIGATION OF IETT FOR THE PURCHASING OF WORK AND OPERATIONS“
Biçer, the lawyer of Kadir Topbaş said, işlem My client, who is the Mayor of Istanbul, has no responsibility for the works and transactions of the General Directorate of IETT, which is a separate public institution. There is no mandate or duty from the public procurement law numbered 4734. In the public financial management law numbered 5018, there are no duties and adjectives such as tender authority or authorizing officer. According to the public procurement law numbered 4734 and in accordance with the public financial management law numbered 5018, authorized and responsible public officials are identified in Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality and in the General Directorate of IETT. IETT will not be considered responsible for the activities and operations of the General Directorate of the General Directorate of Istanbul, Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality does not have a responsibility for the work and operations. The signature of my client in the decisions concerning the amounts exceeding a certain amount of the decisions of the IETT General Directorate is the fulfillment of a procedural procedure only. Otherwise, he is not a member of the council. Therefore, it is unthinkable for IETT to be punished for the works and transactions it has done. Dolayısıyla
TOPBAŞ'S LAWYER: WE REQUEST THE DECISION OF CONDUCTING THE INVESTIGATION
Lawyer Biçer stated that there is no public loss and it is fixed with expert reports. E My client does not have any concrete documents and proofs other than the complainants of the claim that he misused the office. We demand the acquittal of my client for the crime that has not occurred as a result of its elements mayan. Lawyer Abdullah Buladı, the other defendant's lawyer, also acquitted his clients.
THE SANIKS HAVE BEEN
He stated that no precise and clear concrete evidence could be obtained from all kinds of suspicions which were appropriate for the punishment of the accused. Taking into account the principle of ine Doubtful suspect b, the court ruled that the defendants were acquitted separately.
THE ARTS WERE REQUIRED UP TO 3 YEARS
Istanbul Public Prosecutor's Office 12 February 2010 date prepared in the indictment, Otogar-Bağcılar rail carriage system construction system tender was held in 30 July 2003 date. In the indictment, 30 December 2004 Gülermak Heavy Industry and Trade Co. Inc., with the decision of the council in the history of Otogar-Bağcılar rail transport system construction and electromechanical works and vehicle procurement tender. company was announced to tender. Otogar-Bağcılar line was extended to Başak Residences and a new tender was not opened to design and construct the construction works of the tunnel and portal structures of the Bağcılar-Başak Residences metro line and the Olympic Village connection. 21 2006 14 March 1 date of the decision of the administrative committee continues to the construction of the previous tender for the competition and the competition conditions of the competition were claimed to be given in the manner of disruptive action. In the indictment where the public was damaged, Kadir Topbaş and IETT employee 3 were imprisoned for XNUMX year to XNUMX year for the suspect's misconduct.
Be the first to comment