The TCA overturned this rule for State Railways

The TCA overturned this rule for State Railways: The TCA, which has clearly written the names of the firms in the reports on public procurement, has broken this rule in the 347-page report it has prepared for the State Railways, hiding the company names. . We didn't want to have a discussion over the firms, Say he explained.
The violations of the legislation determined in the 2013 works of the Republic of Turkey State Railways (TCDD), which has realized the biggest projects of Turkey in the recent period, barely fit into 374 pages. Among the illegalities determined by the TCA auditors regarding TCDD tenders and requested by the Ministry of Transport to investigate, if necessary, "determination that the tendered railway passes through villages, valuable agricultural lands and even some parts of other railway lines", "the approximate cost that determines the tender price, instead of market research, is the tender. kazanIt also includes making the moment with the price received from the company” and “providing only 96 percent progress in the work where 13 percent of the allowance is spent”.
IN DHMI REPORT
The most important issue in the report of the Court of Auditors no company name was given. In the reports of the TCA, the names of the firms that carried out the work in the tenders that were traditionally examined were clearly written. For example, in the report of State Airports Authority (DHMI) announced for 2013 year, company names are listed clearly. However, this rule was broken in the report prepared for TCDD and the names of companies were hidden.
DISCUSSION ON THE COMPANY
According to the decision taken by the Evaluation Committee of the Report, the Court of Auditors stated that such a path was made, and an official who said erçev Our aim is not to have a discussion over firms. We emphasize the shortcomings of the administration and its operations. Therefore, we can make decisions about the absence of company names. TCDD'da this rule was applied, T he said. TCDD 2013 studies report hiding company names of TCA auditors.
A NIGHT BUSINESS INCREASED IN 20
The first tender that draws attention in the TCA report is as follows: “In the tender opened by TCDD for the procurement of training and consultancy services related to infrastructure and train management, the price research that will determine the average price of the tender was made by obtaining the opinion of only one company. The tender of the firm that submitted the said price information. kazanit turned out to be. Moreover, only 2 bids were received for the tender, and the other firm was eliminated without evaluating its bid for different reasons. tender kazanA contract worth 6 million TL was signed with the company. The tender was not included in the scope of the Public Procurement Law, as the cost was calculated below 6.6 million TL; In other words, it remained within the scope of the exception. However, shortly after the signing of the contract, a 20 percent increase was made in the work and the cost of the work was increased to 7 million TL.” The auditors of the TCA requested that this tender be reviewed by the Ministry of Transport.”
THROUGH 2.2 BILLION TL WITH OTHER LINE
Another controversial tender made by TCDD, according to SAYIŞTAY auditors, was the Yerköy-Sivas section of the Ankara-Sivas high-speed railway line. This tender was also given to a company with an amount of TL 840 million. However, after the contract was signed, many details changed from the length of the tunnel to the line length. The reasons of these changes were listed as m the overlapping of some of the sections with other lines, the proximity to the fault line, the emergence of the necessity to move the villages, the passing of fertile lands and lands Bu. It was decided that the project could not be completed to 840 million TL, and the cost of the second tender was 2.2 billion TL.
96'i percent spending on the 13'ye percent
Controversial transactions were also found in the Bursa-Yenişehir line awarded by TCDD to 393.2 million TL. According to the TCA report, after the signing of the contract, the route change was made in 75 km of the 50 km line. Among the reasons for these changes were the fact that the project passed through very valuable agricultural lands and the impact of Bursa's drinking water network plans. However, after spending up to 96 of the contract price, it was determined that the physical realization remained at 13 level. The 75 kilometer road entered the business liquidation process due to the reaching of the contract cost before the 10 kilometer was reached.

Similar Ads

Be the first to comment

Comments