TCDDden crane description came

A crane statement came from TCDD: In the statement made by the Press and Public Relations Consultancy, it was said that “The 157-year-old TCDD knows how to buy the crane from the crane…”.
The General Directorate of State Railways responded to the news about the operation carried out in Izmir with a new statement.
In the statement made by the Press and Public Relations Consultancy, it was stated that “The 157-year-old TCDD knows how to buy the crane from the crane…”.
The following points were underlined in the statement that started with the following statement regarding the news about the Izmir Port MHC crane tender in a newspaper today.
On the 7 May 2011 date, the aforementioned tender documents have been prepared in accordance with the Public Procurement Law and the relevant legislation, which are open to the competition environment in a way that the crane producers can participate.
There is also a certificate of work experience among the documents requested from the bidders.
The work experience certificate which is claimed to be insufficient is available between the documents.
All bidders are crane manufacturers.
The tender was conducted with open tender method.
The procurement process was examined by the Public Procurement Authority and the Administrative Court.
In addition, the information that the tenderer who offers the most suitable bidder is the crane manufacturer and which type of cranes he / she produces, is accessible to the public even from their own websites.
TCDD does not give tender to the firm.
157 is an annual corporation that carries out TCDD business and transactions according to the law. According to the nature of the work, all procurement processes and document preparations are prepared and managed by experts. The people who have nothing to do with the subject have no ties to the TCDD.
TCDD does not make public address in terms of “similar job description m with technical terms, as the firm appealing when making the tender, as it demands, does business according to the laws and competition conditions.
This complaint was not approved by TCDD and was not deemed appropriate by the Public Procurement Authority and the Administrative Judiciary as the complaint of the complainant company circulating in the newspaper with the files under its seat was prohibiting competition within the framework of the legislation.